高危乳腺癌术后以吡柔比星为主密集化疗临床研究

  • 摘要: 目的:探讨高危乳腺癌术后以吡柔比星(THP)为主密集化疗的临床疗效。方法:选取2004年1月~2005年12月收治高危因素乳腺癌81例,随机分为密集化疗和常规化疗。两组患者化疗药物剂量THP 60 mg/m2d1,紫杉醇 (PTX) 175 mg/m2d2。密集化疗组每14d重复,常规化疗组每21d重复,共化疗4个周期。结果:全部患者均按计划完成治疗,随访5年,随访率95.06%。密集化疗组3年总生存率92.68%,常规化疗组3年总生存率75.00%,两组比较差异有统计学意义(χ2=4.70,P<0.05);两组3年无瘤生存率两组分别是87.80%和67.50%,比较差异有统计学意义 (χ2=4.83,P<0.05);两组5年总生存率分别为60.97%和35.00%;两组比较差异有统计学意义(χ2=5.47,P<0.05);两组5年无瘤生存率分别为53.65%和27.50%。两组比较差异有统计学意义(χ2=5.74,P<0.05)。密集化疗组中Ⅰ~Ⅱ度和Ⅲ~Ⅳ度白细胞降低分别为70.73%和21.94%,Ⅰ~Ⅱ度血小板减少为31.71%, 无Ⅲ~Ⅳ度血小板减少。而常规化疗组Ⅰ~Ⅱ度和Ⅲ~Ⅳ度白细胞降低分别为54.20%和25.00%,Ⅰ~Ⅱ度血小板减少为12.50%,无Ⅲ~Ⅳ度血小板减少。两组患者均未出现粒缺性发热。结论: 密集化疗能有效延长高危乳腺癌患者的生存期,不良反应可耐受。

     

    Abstract: Clinical Observation of Dose-Dense Chemotherapy with THP in the Postoperative Treatment ofHigh Risk Breast CancerHongbo REN1, Zhonghui BAO1, Jifan YANG1, Biyou HUANG1, Shaolin LI2Correspondence to: Shaolin LI, E-mail: rhb2006@sina.com1Department of Oncology, The Second People’ s Hospital, Chongqing 400054, China2Department of Oncology, Chongqing University of Medical Sciences, Chongqing 400016, ChinaThis work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No.30424005)Abstract Objective: To observe the clinical effect of dose-dense chemotherapy with THP-containing agents in the postopera-tive treatment for high risk breast cancer. Methods: During a period from January 2004 to December 2005, 81 patients with high riskbreast cancer were randomly allocated into two groups: the Dose-dense Group (G1) and the Conventional Chemotherapy Group (G2).The dose of the chemotherapeutic agents was THP60mg/m2d1 and PTX175mg/m2d2. The administration was repeated every 14 daysin the G1 group and every 21 days in the G2 group, with a total treatment of 4 cycles. Results: There were 41 patients in the G1 groupand 40 patients in the G2 group. All 81 patients completed chemotherapy as planned. All patients were followed-up for more than 5years, with a follow-up rate of 95.06%. The 3-year overall survival rate was 92.68% and 75.0% ( χ2= 4.70, P < 0.05 ) in G1 and G2, re-spectively. The 3-year relapse-free rate was 87.80% and 67.50% in the two groups ( χ2= 4.83, P < 0.05 ), with significant differences be-tween the two groups. The 5-year overall survival rate was 60.97% and 35.00% ( χ2= 5.47, P < 0.05 ) in G1 and G2, and the 5-year tu-mor-free survival was 53.65% and 27.5%% ( χ2= 5.74, P < 0.05 ) in G1 and G2, respectively, with significant differences between thetwo groups. The major toxicities included neutropenia, nausea, vomiting, hepatic lesions and alopecia. The incidence of gradeⅠ-Ⅱandgrade Ⅲ-Ⅳ neutropenia were 70.73% and 21.94% in G1, respectively, and the incidence of grade Ⅰ-Ⅱand grade III-IV thrombopeniawere 31.71% and 0 in G1, respectively. The incidence of gradeⅠ-Ⅱand grade Ⅲ-Ⅳ neutropenia were 54.20% and 25.00% in G2, re-spectively, and the incidence of gradeⅠ-Ⅱand grade III-IV thrombopenia were 12.50% and 0 in G2, respectively. The median DFS andOS were not obtained. Agranulocytic fever was not observed in any patients. Conclusion: Postoperative dose-dense chemotherapy forhigh risk breast cancer can effectively improve the 3- and 5-year survival rates and the adverse side effects are tolerable.Keywords Breast cancer; Dose-dense chemotherapy; Adjuvant chemotherapy; THP

     

/

返回文章
返回